Cyber Security SpaceCYBERSECURITYSPACE.NET
Community
Community HubEventsNewsletterSubmit a Tool
Careers
JobsCareer GuidesFor ProfessionalsCertifications
Learn
Learning PathsEducationGuidesGlossaryTools
News & Threats
NewsBlogThreat LibraryCrypto Security
Small Business
Security CheckupSecurity GuidesComplianceIncident ResponseSecurity Monitor
Join the community
Cyber Security Space

A community for cybersecurity professionals and enthusiasts: careers, learning, and people to learn with. Practical guidance for small businesses too.

Small Business

  • Security Checkup
  • Security Checklist
  • Security Guides
  • Templates
  • Security Tools

Security

  • Website Security
  • Incident Response
  • Compliance
  • Threat Library
  • Crypto Security

Resources

  • Resources
  • News
  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Jobs
  • Learning

Company

  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
© 2026 Cyber Security Spacecybersecurityspace.net

Tools

Website Security Check

A single pass across the five external signal groups that matter: spam content, redirects, headers, TLS and exposed paths.

Published 2 Aug 2026 · Updated 27 Aug 2026 · 3 min read

Short answer

The Website Security Check runs the externally observable checks in one pass — injected spam content, redirect behaviour, HTTP security headers, TLS certificate state and commonly exposed paths — and returns a prioritised findings list with remediation guidance for each item.

What is covered, and what is not

Covered externallyRequires server access
Injected and cloaked spam contentFile integrity comparison
Conditional redirect behaviourDatabase content review
HTTP security headersAdministrator account audit
TLS certificate validityLog analysis
Commonly exposed pathsScheduled task review
Status: in development. The hacked-site guide walks the same sequence manually, including the parts a scanner cannot reach.

How often should you run it?

Monthly for a small brochure site, weekly for anything transactional, and immediately after a platform migration, plugin change or agency handover — those transitions are when configuration regressions appear.

Who should use this check?

  • Owners who suspect a compromise but have no idea where to start looking.
  • Small teams without a security function who need a prioritised list rather than a raw scan dump.
  • Agencies performing due diligence on a site they are taking over.
  • Anyone re-verifying a site a week after a cleanup, when reinfection typically shows up.

Why combine several checks instead of one?

Each individual signal has a blind spot. Header checks say nothing about injected content. A spam check says nothing about transport security. A redirect trace from one device misses conditional payloads. Combining search-side, content-side, redirect and header evidence is what turns a set of isolated observations into a defensible answer about whether a site is compromised.

  • Search-side signals show what Google sees, which is often ahead of what the owner sees.
  • Content signals reveal injected markup, hidden anchors and language mismatches.
  • Redirect signals expose conditional behaviour that only affects some visitors.
  • Header signals measure how much damage a future injection could do.

What can this check not determine?

  • It has no filesystem or database access, so it cannot enumerate backdoors, modified core files or rogue accounts.
  • It cannot see anything behind a login, a WAF challenge or an IP allowlist.
  • It cannot date the compromise; server access logs are the only reliable source for that.
  • It is not a vulnerability scanner and does not attempt exploitation of any kind.
  • It cannot replace incident response on a site handling payments or personal data — treat those cases as reportable incidents from the outset.
If the site processes card payments, escalate to your payment provider and hosting provider immediately rather than starting with a public scan.

How do you turn the results into a plan?

  1. STEP 01

    Separate compromise findings from hardening findings

    Injected content, unexpected redirects and crawler-only output are incidents. Missing headers and weak policies are hardening work.

  2. STEP 02

    Handle the incident first

    Preserve evidence, remove persistence, clean content, rotate credentials, then verify — in that order.

  3. STEP 03

    Close the entry point

    Patch the platform and every extension, remove unused plugins and themes, and enforce MFA on administrative accounts.

  4. STEP 04

    Then apply the hardening list

    Headers, least-privilege CMS roles, backup verification and monitoring, so the next attempt has a smaller blast radius.

  5. STEP 05

    Schedule re-checks

    Re-run at 24 hours, one week and one month. Reinfection almost always happens inside that window if persistence was missed.

Sources

  • Help for hacked sites — Google Search Central

Prefer summary updates? Subscribe to the newsletter.

On this page

  • What is covered, and what is not
  • How often should you run it?
  • Who should use this check?
  • Why combine several checks instead of one?
  • What can this check not determine?
  • How do you turn the results into a plan?